Jesus, the Fairy Tale of the Letter J, the Magic Language, and the Real Yeshua

We live in treacherous times, but the true followers of Jesus have a name that will get us through those times and save us. That name is Jesus. Satan despises that name, and so do the Judaizers today who work feverishly to remove the name of Jesus. Eventually, Christians will be killed if they refuse to reject the name of Jesus.

A set of laws called the Noahide Laws were passed into effect at a secret meeting of the U.S. Congress in 1991. Those laws call for the beheading of anyone who worships Jesus. They are now on the books in every other country around the world as well. All that the Jews need today is the official nod to enforce them, and everything will be ready to go. But in the meantime, Satan has launched a full-time campaign to get Christians to renounce the name of Jesus—not based on the Noahide Laws yet, but on the basis of a lie that sounds very convincing to many people.

With plenty of help from the false brethren and the Hebrew Roots movement, Satan is spreading a lie stating that since there was no letter “J” in Greek and no letter “J” in English until the 1500s, the name of Jesus we spell today with a “J” is a fraud. With no “J,” there couldn’t have been any “J” sound, they carelessly conclude, hoping that no one knows anything about Greek or early English.

The zealous Hebrew Roots people want everyone to believe their conclusion regarding language and then reject the name of Jesus as fraud. People from the Hebrew Roots movement post their lie everywhere. They state partial information and their grossly contorted assertion as though it results from actual research and historical truth when, in reality, it reflects neither. Not only do they purposely exclude indispensable facts on the matter, but by focusing only on the name of Jesus, the promoters of this rumor display a shameful partiality against the name of Jesus.

If people who spread this lie were really sincere about their concern, and if their claims were actually true, then they would be warning us about many other names of people who lived when Jesus lived and whose names would have the exact same issue. If the problem concerning the letter “J” was a real issue, then all those posting on social media would also warn us to get rid of hundreds of other names that we should discard on the same basis for the same bogus reason—names like James, Jude, John, Joseph—that we spell today using a “J,” even though at the time those people lived, there was no “J.” Their names were spelled with an “I,” just like Jesus’s name was spelled with an “I.”

So why such a premeditated effort to remove only the name of Jesus? Why so surreptitiously sweep all those other names under the rug, hoping that nobody will see? If you smell a rat here, you’re not the only one.

Besides all their efforts to get Christians to deny Jesus, Hebrew Roots people also seduce Christians to use a particular name to replace Jesus with. For this lie, too, they hope that no one will do any real research to challenge their claim. However, the new name they have successfully lured sad multitudes of Christians to use is the strange name “Yeshua”—even though the name “Yeshua” never appears in the oldest and most reliable version of the Old Testament we have, called the Septuagint; even though the name “Yeshua” never appears in any of the original New Testament manuscripts or manuscript fragments found from the first century, all written in Greek and none containing the name “Yeshua”; and even though the name “Yeshua” never appears in the highly respected histories written by a Jewish historian named Flavius Josephus.

Not only did Josephus live during the time that Jesus was here, but Josephus also happened to be a Jewish priest. So apparently, that was too early for Josephus to get the memo from today’s Judaizers about changing the name of Jesus to a fake name. Josephus, in all his lengthy, detailed histories about the Jewish people, never said one word about “Yeshua.” Josephus spoke respectfully about Jesus and called him “Jesus.”

If the Hebrew Roots people were sincere about offering us the new name “Yeshua,” then why did their rabbis hide the fact that “Yeshua” was the name of their hero—someone made up in their own magical, mystical, extra-biblical writings of their cult? Why do the Jewish rabbis continue to push the name “Yeshua” while knowing full well that it does not refer to Jesus?

It doesn’t take long for any earnest follower of Jesus to discover a very dark, unholy trail behind the name “Yeshua.” Why are so many people so committed to getting Christians to stop using the name of Jesus—often with a spirit of actual hatred toward their targeted Christian victims? Some even accuse Christians of anti-Semitism if they prefer to use the name of Jesus instead.

I’m talking more about people who seemingly know the truth but refuse to use the name “Yeshua.” The question becomes: Why? I believe this is my theory: because it’s a deep-seated anti-Semitism. Yes, the people in the Hebrew Roots movement—at least those behind the movement and leading the movement—are definitely hiding something from us about this strange new name “Yeshua.”

What are they hiding? Why all the accelerated propaganda pushing the name? Are we looking at something even more sinister than we thought? And where did the name “Yeshua” appear from? Did they just pull it out of a hat? If that is your guess—funny or not—you happen to be on the right trail. Pulling something out of a hat relates to magic, and magic not only relates to the world of the cult, which lies at the heart of Judaism, but according to one of its highly treasured writings, the Zohar, when the Creator created the world, he actually used a magic phrase.

A magician takes a hat, so I’m going to pull a rabbit out of this hat. Tell me, what does he say? “Abracadabra!” It means, “I will create something from nothing,” right? Listen to this: one of the oldest books of the Zohar, which is attributed to Rabbi Abraham the Sage, we have called the Book of Creation. At the beginning of the Book of Creation, he describes how God created the world, and listen to what the Zohar says:

“Shall create through speech: Abracadabra.”

During the first century, Paul knew full well that magic lay at the heart of Judaism in his day. Paul used the word “bewitched” to describe New Testament believers who became the victims of Judaism. Judaism charmed them, and people who had begun to follow Jesus became smitten by that charm, trading their salvation for a path leading to hell. Judaizers today charm Christians in the exact same way. They mesmerize them, getting them to focus on Jews, Israel, and Hebrew rather than focusing simply on Jesus and His kingdom, like He commanded.

The two points of focus cannot be combined, even though Hebrew Roots people will tell you that they can. We have only two sides in the spirit world: either that which is holy or that which comes from Satan. When today’s Christians fall into the trap of forsaking Jesus—first by rejecting His name—they, too, enter a path of death, which is a decision only possible through witchcraft. Paul asked Judaizers’ victims of his day, “Who has bewitched you?” And I would ask the same today.

Jesus offers an entirely New Covenant—a new set of terms between man and the Father. It defines a whole new people of God, no longer promoting any one nationality or any one language. Jesus welcomes us all on the same basis, with the same terms, no matter what language we speak and no matter what DNA we have.

Today’s rabbis are not just well-meaning followers of Moses who couldn’t quite recognize Jesus was the Messiah. This was my own naive understanding for a good part of my life, and perhaps yours as well. But today’s rabbis are actually stuck in the same Jewish mysticism and occult beliefs and practices of their ancestors, the Pharisees. Rabbis do not follow the Bible but openly follow the same abominations by which they had been so unfaithful before and for which the Father finalized His relationship with a certificate of divorce—the same practices that Jesus hated and constantly condemned.

You are about to see and hear what today’s Jewish rabbis have been hiding about “Yeshua” and why they viciously promote the name “Yeshua.” Their reasons are far more deadly than we first expected. If you or anyone you know is a true believer in Jesus and at all on the fence about the name “Yeshua,” I encourage you to watch this video. Once you see and hear what I’m about to show you, I doubt you will ever want to call Jesus “Yeshua” ever again.

Hi, I’m Dolly Weber. First, the phony claim about Jesus and the letter “J.” This widespread argument is nothing more than one big cheap shot attempt to get rid of the name Jesus and nothing more. It is based on a made-up story promoted by people who hate Jesus and vehemently hate His name, and I’ll give you some proof.

The original Greek texts of the New Testament were translated into English by a Greek scholar. His name was William Tyndale. Tyndale was not only highly regarded for his expertise in Greek, but he was an extraordinarily devout follower of Jesus who even risked his life for the sake of translating the New Testament accurately. Once he completed the work, the Roman Catholic Church found him, killed him, and publicly burned his body at the stake.

We can see here what Tyndale’s translation looked like. On these pages, we see the name of Jesus spelled beginning with an “I.” They pronounced the “I” like a “J” and called him “Jesus,” just as we pronounce the name today and now spell His name with a “J.” And Jesus wasn’t the only name like this. Take a look at these other names we recognize—names we today spell with a “J,” pronounced with a “J” sound, though at the time, those names were spelled beginning with an “I.”

How could that be? Wouldn’t the name “Jesus” have been pronounced “Yesus”? The answer is no. It would have been pronounced just like we pronounce it today: “Jesus.” Back then, up until the 1500s, in fact, the “I” had two jobs: one was to be a vowel, the letter “I,” as we see in these screenshots showing the familiar names of Isaiah and Israel. In those situations, the “I” was pronounced like “I” or “eye.” The other job was to be a consonant—the “J” sound—like in the names Jesus, John, James, and so forth. It was pronounced like a “J.”

In common words such as “judge,” “joy,” and “just,” all of these words began with an “I,” but they were pronounced as though they started with a “J,” just like we pronounce today. So how did people know back then which was which? Well, the rule was quite simple: if the “I” comes before a consonant, such as the letter “S” in “Israel” or “Isaiah,” then you pronounce the “I” like a vowel. And if the “I” comes before a vowel, such as “E,” “O,” or “A,” as we see in these examples, then you pronounce the “I” like a consonant—like the letter “J.”

In the same way, “judge,” “joy,” and “just” start with the letter “I” that comes before a vowel, and so those words, too, would be pronounced as though they were spelled with a “J.” This was not rocket science. People knew how to pronounce the “I” in those names and words, just as we know to pronounce the letter “P” like a “P” in the word “popcorn” but pronounce it like an “F” in the word “phone.”

All languages have their rules, and English did, too. If the “I” came before a vowel, you pronounced it like a “J.” Around the early 1500s, the printing press was greatly expanding its use, primarily in the task of printing Tyndale’s Bible. So, for the sake of more clarity concerning the letter “I,” someone suggested splitting up the two jobs of the letter “I.” Let the “I” do the job of the vowel “I,” as it always has, but assign its consonant job to a new letter. Let’s call it a “J” and change the “I” only slightly, and then that’ll be what the “J” looks like.

Notice the “J” was introduced as a familiar sound but under a new name. They did not invent a new sound. On the contrary, it was precisely because they already had hundreds of names and other words that used the “J” sound that’s why they assigned a new letter to help out the letter “I” in this way.

And so, around 1524, the capital “J” was given its own symbol and referred to by its own name, “J,” taking over for an old job of the letter “I.” But actually, that was not the first time that a “J” was used in this way. The lowercase “J” was actually introduced into English in the 1200s, though not made official until much later. Tyndale did not use the lowercase “J” in his translation, though he could have.

Not only would the “J” denote a sound already familiar in the English language, but in both the lowercase “J” and the uppercase “J,” they looked an awful lot like—and even identical to—the letter “I.” “J” was a familiar face to the English language, though not officially recognized until 1524.

In the block-style Greek letter “Iota,” take a look at the lowercase. What does it look like? Yes, the lowercase Iota or “I” is a backwards “J.” So the new letter “J” practically was an “I” just backwards, and it did one of the jobs that the letter “I” used to do. But that’s not all. Take a look at what the handwritten capital “I” looked like back then. It virtually was a “J,” though at the time it was called an “I.” Isn’t that amazing?

No doubt, instances of names and places beginning with a “J” sound were the predominant use of that capital letter “I.” Thus, they took the same symbol—a capital “I” in cursive—and made that a “J,” as we can easily see. The “J” was not actually a whole new letter. Neither could it really be said that it was invented. The “J” symbol was simply a slight variation of the “I” symbol in both the upper and lowercase versions.

And it would be more accurate to say that the letter “I” got a new job description, with part of its old job reassigned to a close relative. So when people promote the lie stating that there was no “J” until it was invented in the 1500s, they are, as we can see, very deceptively leaving out the fact that the “J” sound had existed for centuries and that the symbol formally used for the “J” sound was simply given to another letter—a new tweak, if you will.

This often reminds me of when a woman gets married and takes on her husband’s name. That woman now becomes known by a new name, but do we say that she just got invented? Did she become a new person? Part of the “I’s” job was to be a “J,” and finally, they decided to give its job to another symbol—a symbol that no doubt reminded the readers of an “I,” and they knew how to pronounce the new symbol.

Again, if you were to read the original Tyndale Bible or an earlier version of the Geneva Bible, as we can find online, you would find countless names beginning with a capital “I” that you would immediately recognize and know how to pronounce intuitively. However, if you follow the basic pronunciation rule for the letter “I” back when the name of Jesus began with an “I,” I’m sure you would become quite proficient with how to pronounce the “I.”

Again, if the “I” precedes a vowel, then it sounds like a “J.” If the “I” precedes a consonant, then it sounds like an “I.” Simple. When people back in the day read the name “Iesous,” whether in Greek or in English, they knew to pronounce the “I” or Iota like a “J.” His name was “Jesus.”

What Hebrew Roots people don’t want you to discover is that we find the same rule of pronunciation used on words in the secular world back then. Here is a poem called “The Tragical History of Romeus and Juliet.” It was published in 1562, and years later, Shakespeare used this poem to write a play he called “Romeo and Juliet,” published in 1597.

Notice the “J” of “Juliet” in the original poem was expressed with an “I.” If we didn’t know any better, we would pronounce that “Iuliet,” right? According to the Hebrew Roots people, that’s how we should pronounce it. What’s the rule? The “I” comes before a vowel—the letter “U”—so you pronounce it “Juliet.”

Here, Shakespeare continued to use the letter “I” for his title, and when the title was expressed in cursive, there we see the capital “I,” which, as I mentioned, today we would call a “J” because it is a “J,” but at the time, it was still called an “I.” A title page of the King James Bible also shows the name “James,” as in King James, expressed with an “I” instead of a “J.”

So did people pronounce the king’s name as “Yames”? No, they pronounced it “James,” just as it was written when they used the letter “I” for the “J” sound. Everyone knew to pronounce his name “James” because the “I” came before a vowel—the letter “A”—thus, the “I” was pronounced like a consonant—the letter “J.”

Can we see how misleading the half-story about the letter “J” is? How devilish for those in the Hebrew Roots movement to deceive and mislead people by half-truths to trick them into discarding the name of Jesus—all by pretending to have an upper hand in historic knowledge and how to pronounce old languages?

But an even more devilish double standard hit me as I pondered their deception. Two other words came to my attention—two words that the Hebrew Roots movement, for some reason, haven’t mentioned anything about. Consider the words “Jew” and “Jews.” They were spelled beginning with an “I” before the “J” was introduced, but they are pronounced today as beginning with a “J” and spelled today with a “J,” right? Just like the name of Jesus.

So why did the Hebrew Roots people fail to bring these two words to everyone’s attention, telling us they would have been pronounced “Yew” and “Yews” and therefore telling us that they are phony names because there was no “J” until the 1500s?

Clearly, those who proclaim that “Jesus” is a phony name do not have any problem with the name based on history itself or language. They have a problem with Jesus Himself, and they will do anything they can—including cheating and lying—to get true Christians to stop using the real name of Jesus, which is “Jesus.”

So who are these people who are so actively pitching a phony name for Jesus? Let’s open the curtain hiding the answer to that question, starting with a short testimony from Steve and Jana Denon. They produce a program called “Israeli News Live,” and they also used to be Zionist Christians.

Before it was “Israeli News Live,” we started off as a teaching ministry but very pro-Zionist. I come from a Jewish background. Both my parents were Jews. They were non-practicing Jews, but I still come from that background. I’d given my life to Christ when I was 8 years old. Even though I believed the Lord Jesus Christ as Savior, I was still very much a pro-Zionist type believer, looking at the Scriptures more from the Scofield-type glasses.

“Israeli News Live” was mainly looking at the geopolitical spectrum from more of a biblical aspect, and we really grew very rapidly in popularity with this program—and always from my own heart, very sincere in what I believed and very passionate about it. I survived a suicide bombing in Israel in 2004 by the grace of God.

But as we built the ministry there, then things began to change. My wife first began to notice a lot of things, and she had me read one book called “The Holocaust Victims Accuse,” which really was Jewish rabbis talking about what they went through during the Holocaust and how it was the Zionist leaders that were turning their backs on them and allowing other Jews to go to the Holocaust camps.

That really began to wake me up because of being of a Jewish background. I went deeper into my just searching roots, even as a believer. I went in. I got more involved with the Chabad organization. I would visit rabbis and then built friendships with them. I actually became a member of the Chabad organization for more than 20 years.

It’s kind of like joining a church, you know? You just—next thing you know, you just sign the thing that you have joined. It’s not like some part of the elite sect of the Chabad organization, but we had very strong ties with them, and we would go—not all the time going to the synagogue and stuff—but I had business relationships with them because of the moving business we owned.

We had a lot of relationships with the rabbis throughout South Florida, Northwest Florida as well. And the deeper you get into the circles like this, the more you begin to learn the way Jewish people actually think. Of course, living in Israel, you learn that as well.

And as far as a Gentile, they’re very much looked down upon. When you mention like a donkey—I can’t tell you how many times I’ve sat there with doctors and lawyers, just being friends, and then they forget that I’m an actual believer. In some cases, they didn’t even know I was a believer—maybe I didn’t say anything to them at the time—and they would say, “Steve, that’s just Gentiles. What are you worried about the Gentiles for? You know, they’re going to be our slaves one day,” and things like this.

Just always stuck in the back of my mind. They openly talk about Gentiles being slaves. Absolutely. Absolutely.

Well, I’m originally from Eastern Europe, former Czechoslovakia, and I came to Christ in 2010. My background is that I’m from kind of a mixed household. My mother was not Jewish; she was a Gentile. So in Israel, they consider me a Gentile. They don’t consider people whose father is a Jew—they don’t consider them Jewish. So I am labeled often as anti-Semitic when I speak, all because we just bring to light the teachings of Judaism.

While in Israel, of course, when you’re there, you start noticing things. But because of our Zionist approach to prophecy and to the Bible in general—and we were in a circle of Zionist Christians—I started to research a lot: Jewish roots and Jewishness. And I wanted to know what it is that Judaism is about. What does Judaism believe?

So I started to study their writings, and their writings include Talmud, Zohar, Kabbalah, Shulchan Aruch—which is their Jewish law, or it’s called Halacha—and I started to listen to a lot of teachings by rabbis. I would open up a lot of videos that Chabad rabbis would specifically teach on Halacha and on Talmud and explain certain things.

And I started to see that there is a huge discrepancy between Christianity and Judaism—that Christianity has absolutely nothing to do with Judaism. “Judeo-Christianity,” as often as referred to, is an oxymoron statement. It’s diametrically opposed.

And I started to see that, basically, they actually are the enemies of Christianity. Judaism as we know it today is basically Pharisee-ism. Judaism is not true faith; it’s nothing that God has given.

So I started to notice that we have the same battles today as first-century Christians, as apostles, and that our enemies are the same enemies as enemies of Jesus. And it was the Pharisees with their oral law.

You see a lot of Christians today, especially in Zionist circles, they think that Judaism is about the Old Testament, that Judaism is just the Old Testament—all they believe, the Jews, they just believed in Moses’ law, and they practice the law of Moses. They have 613 commandments.

Most of these Christians are not familiar with the Talmud, Zohar, and Kabbalah and where this 613 mitzvot comes from and what they’re all about. So I started to study what they’re about and what the Talmud teaches. And I noticed that there is actually a plan. There is a plot, and that’s a plot against Christianity.

And I could not logically understand: Why would Christian leaders form friendships with Jewish rabbis? At first, let me bring you one of the books here: “The Secret Doctrine in Israel” by Waite. What it explains is the basically secret doctrine of the Zohar—what is behind Zohar.

And you have to understand that the soul of the Talmud is Zohar, and the soul of Zohar is Kabbalah—the occultism or sorcery, as I refer to it now. This particular book—it doesn’t speak against it; it only explains what it is, what the secret doctrine is.

And here, in a preface, it actually speaks of the secret tradition in Israel, together with some account of the manner in which it influenced Christian scholarship in Europe during the 16th, 17th, and 18th centuries.

It seems like this is a plot that is not new. This has been pre-planned a long, long time. They’ve been infiltrating Christian churches and universities and organizations for centuries—exactly to change the Gospel, to change the Gospel, and completely put a virus in Christianity. I call that a virus.

You know, 11 of the Pharisees—and today’s Christianity, especially here in America, has a virus. And we have to identify what the virus is. But it’s basically the same problem as Apostle Paul has: it’s a Judaizing—Judaizing of Christianity. But they also brought in occultic practices.

As far as I was studying this, I came to a really shocking information: What is the actual secret doctrine of the Zohar? It’s not pretty. I don’t really recommend that people who are not strong in faith—it’s a book for the purpose of researching what the doctrine of actual Kabbalah, Zohar, and Talmud is—what Judaism is about.

Because once you understand what Judaism is about, you start understanding that these bridges that Christian ministers are making with Pharisees or rabbis today—those are very dangerous bridges. And on one side, you know, it’s always Christians that submit to the Jews. It’s always Christians that have to agree not to preach Jesus to Jews.

You see, the Jews—they don’t compromise. They will never compromise what they believe. But the Christians are ready to compromise. And why? Because they have wolves for teachers who have actually made bridges with the Pharisees—the enemy of Christ.

But in this particular book, I just want to read you a little bit what got me understanding what the plot is against Christianity. It says here:

“According to the Midrash, the Messiah will bring eternal peace—which, of course, was understood by the Israelites as peace for Israel—plus that which may follow: extermination for all who did not enter by conversion into the house of Jacob.”

So basically, what they teach is that if Gentiles or Christians do not attach themselves to the Jews, they will be exterminated. And of course, we are well known for our Noahide Laws that we brought this to light.

So then you go to Talmud, and you start reading what is the plan for Gentiles. You see, Judaism is a two-tier system. Judaism puts the wall of partition back. It’s the Jews and non-Jews. And according to Judaism, non-Jews are different species. There are humans, but they’re not at the level of the Jews.

Jews are supposedly divine. They’re light of the world. They’re the chosen. They have life of Hashem inside of them—that’s the way they explain life of God inside. And the Gentiles—they can never achieve it. They’re different species. They are on an animalistic level.

And the only way for Gentiles to make it to the world to come is to attach themselves to the Jews. And how do they do that? Well, through the Noahide Laws—seven Noahide Laws.

When we got attacked for bringing out the Noahide Laws, it was suggested that only a small percentage—about 2% of radical Jews in Israel—actually believe this. But that’s the farthest thing from the truth. But even if it were a small percentage, you have to keep in mind: it’s that percentage that control the world governments.

At least 30% of all Jews hold the Talmud as a sacred writing—as the oral law of God—and it’s held in higher regard than the Bible itself. It’s held in higher regard than the Bible itself.

I know that some will try to play that down and say that’s not true, but that is totally false. It is known by any Orthodox Jew that the Talmud has more preeminence than that of Moses or the prophets themselves. The Talmud has more preeminence than that of Moses or the prophets themselves.

What are some of the more shocking statements in the Talmud? The shocking statements—there are many. Yeah, there are many. Let me kind of clarify because they do get kind of misquoted a little bit, but it still holds true.

Like, for example, when it speaks about in the Talmud—some people try to say that it condones a sexual relation or pedophilia between a man and a boy as long as he is under 9 years of age. It said it’s not considered homosexuality. It doesn’t really condone it, but what it does is it minimizes the offense.

So they write in the Talmud: If the boy is under 9 years of age, then it’s not considered a homosexual act. That’s actually written in the Talmud. And I have the entire Soncino Talmud on my bookshelf in my office.

But the reason why they do this is because they know that the law of Moses would command that if you have homosexuality, then that person is to be stoned. So they don’t want the rabbis to be guilty if they end up getting caught, so they minimize it.

Same thing with—they minimize if a little girl under the age of 3 years old—it’s depending on the rabbi, depends on whether it’s 9 years old or 3 years old—in the Talmud would consider no different than if the girl were to be defiled as if you poked her in her eye. In other words, it’ll just heal back; it’s no big deal.

Jesus Himself—He’s written about. They don’t use His name; they normally use “Balaam” when it’s written in the Talmud. But I can literally show you right in the Talmud, right in the notes, where it says on there that “Balaam” is a substitute in coded language in the Talmud for Jesus.

And they say that He is in hell and boiling in feces—that type of thing. Those are some of the more bold things that a lot of people are more aware of. But there are tons of things—many times unbeknown to the followers—here, they’re being taught Talmudic and Zohar prophecies, and the people have no idea that this is what they’re being taught.

Shalom from the Eternal City of Jerusalem. I’m here with Ariel Cohen. All right, what a pleasure. And he’s been teaching me how the rabbis study the word of God. It’s a little bit different from the way that Christians study it.

We really—we’re just at the surface, but the rabbis—they can really go layer after layer. And one of those layers is just taking the letters of the Hebrew words, and they look at the value because each letter has a numerical value, and that’s called Gematria.

We’re looking at some Gematria now. Is Gematria from God? Well, you have to be the judge. Gematria—to begin with, of course, it is numerology. I always call it like tarot cards. It’s really a shame that this is actually entered into the church to begin with.

But Gematria—the numeric value was borrowed from the Greeks. The Greeks borrowed it from the Egyptians. Hebrew never had this originally. Hebrew never had this originally. And this is what a lot of people are totally forgetting.

And of course, pastors are becoming more like—as the Scripture describes them—hirelings. They don’t care about the flock whatsoever. And this numerology—whether it be through Bible codes, whether it be through the numeric value—ends up making havoc of the word of God.

And this is the reason why we have in Judaism, for example, they’re looking for the Messiah to come, but they don’t tell you—well, now they’re becoming more open—they call it the Nachash Messiah, which is the serpent Messiah—is what they’re looking for.

And they say that the word “serpent” (Nachash) and “Messiah” (Mashiach) has the same Gematria value. That should be the first sign that this is demonic in the first place. There’s no longer the people looking for the way God said He reveals Himself.

It’s very dangerous. It’s very dangerous.

Steve Denon described the Talmud, which, in the words of Brandon T. Ward in his article, “What Does the Talmud Say About Jesus?”, is a vile book that slanders Jesus Christ. It’s a book filled with perversion and filth—a book that declares Jews can lie, cheat, steal, and murder Gentiles.

There is no other vile book like this in the entire world. We could compare the Talmud with the Satanic Bible. And if it were just one random book loved by just a few extreme rabbis, that would be one thing. But the Talmud is followed more than the Bible by all Orthodox rabbis.

For anyone wanting Jewish citizenship in Israel, they must be approved by an Orthodox Jewish rabbi as an Orthodox Jew. Therefore, they, too, must be followers of the Talmud.

I think we need to take a closer look at this Talmud—especially when all Jewish citizens in Israel and all Orthodox rabbis must take the Talmud seriously. Greatness of the rabbis was established, and thousands of new laws were formulated there.

Those same Pharisees who killed Jesus Christ remained the undisputed rulers of Judaism in Babylon. The Pharisees codified their oral traditions into the Babylonian Talmud—the written form of that oral tradition which Jesus so bitterly rebuked.

The Talmud reveals how deep was Israel’s apostasy. The Talmud also helps us understand the basis for Christ’s unflattering descriptions of the Pharisees.

Jesus described the Pharisees as hypocrites, children of hell, blind guides, whitewashed tombs, full of dead men’s bones. He even described the Pharisees as children of their father, the devil—a murderer from the beginning.

The Talmud confirms Christ’s words. In the Talmud, in Tractate Sanhedrin, an extensive passage describes the right of the Pharisee to kill anyone just as long as he did so indirectly.

As one of dozens of examples, the Talmud tells us that if one bound his neighbor and he died of starvation, he is not liable to execution. In such an indirect manner, the Pharisees also killed Christ, manipulating the Romans to actually wield the spear and sword.

The Pharisees claimed—as their descendants do today—that since the Romans were the direct cause of the death of Christ, it is the Romans, not the Jews, who are guilty.

Christ also called the Pharisees adulterers—an adulterous generation. The Talmud provides generous loopholes for adultery. It says the penalty for adultery does not include sex with a minor, the wife of a minor, or the wife of a heathen.

The Talmud also encourages seduction of unwed adolescent girls, called “designated bondmaids.” But it’s important how such rapes are performed: “With the designated bondmaid, one is guilty only in the case of natural connection, but not in the case of perverse connection.”

The Pharisees reasoned that rape in a perverted manner is outside the jurisdiction of the law. Normal rape, however, was punishable in Babylon.

Sexual perversion of every kind had been a way of life for millennia. The Pharisees were deeply influenced by such practices. In three of the major treatises of the Talmud are found extensive passages which give legal endorsement to seduce and marry 3-year-old baby girls.

In fact, many of the greatest rabbis of the Talmud, including Simeon ben Yohai, upheld this privilege. Today in Israel, thousands of Jews go to Meron every year to venerate the memory of Simeon ben Yohai—one of the most respected rabbis in the history of Judaism.

In one of dozens of endorsements of child sex, Simeon ben Yohai said, “A proelyte under the age of 3 years and a day is permitted to marry a priest.”

Agreeing with ben Yohai, the great Rabba said, “When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl, it is nothing. Or when the girl is less than this 3 years and a day, it is as if one put the finger into the eye.”

The footnote to this passage says, “As tears come to the eye again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under 3 years.”

The same section confirms that sexual activity with small boys is in the same category: “The intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act.”

In addition to adulterers, Christ—in the story of the Good Samaritan—portrayed the Pharisees as racial bigots too self-righteous to respond to the suffering of one who was not a Jew.

It is true—because of the wickedness of the Canaanites, which included sodomy and infant sacrifice—Israel had been commanded by God to be harsh in her treatment of the inhabitants of the land. God made it clear that the Canaanites were not simply to be avoided but destroyed.

By the time of the New Testament, this method of preserving God’s kingdom by separation and the sword had become obsolete. God no longer made a racial difference between men. But the Pharisees were unfazed by God’s new agenda.

The Talmud was finally written down nearly five centuries after Christ, yet its critical—even homicidal—attitudes toward Gentiles might have been lifted out of the Book of Joshua.

However, the quickest way to grasp the Talmudic view of Gentiles is not directly from the Talmud but from the Jewish encyclopedias. If we quote an isolated opinion from a Talmud, a rabbi may quickly object, saying, “But that is not the overall opinion of the Talmud. That is not the definitive view.”

What the Jewish Encyclopedia provides us is a definitive overview of perhaps hundreds of rabbi statements on any subject, giving us accurate summaries of what the Talmud generally teaches.

In its article on Gentiles, the Jewish Encyclopedia begins to define what makes a Jew so different from a Gentile. According to the rabbis, only Israelites are men. Gentiles they class not as men but as barbarians.

Since Gentiles are not men in the fullest sense, the Gentile is not a neighbor of a Jew. Further, since Gentile laws were too crude to admit of reciprocity (meaning too crude to be taken seriously), the Gentile was forever beneath the Jew.

Gentiles were outlawed by God from the beginning and thus had no property rights. The Almighty offered the Torah to the Gentile nations also, but since they refused to accept it, He withdrew His shining legal protection from them and transferred their property rights to Israel, who observed His law.

Since the Talmud outlawed the child or issue of a Gentile as that of a beast, a Gentile had as little legal rights in a Jewish court as did an animal.

The Talmud states that if a Gentile sues an Israelite, the verdict is for the defendant—the Israelite. Conversely, if the Israelite is the plaintiff, he obtains full damages.

Because the Talmud conspires against Gentiles, if a Jew was ever caught telling a Gentile what the Talmud really says, such a person deserves death.

So vile was the nature of a Gentile that the great Simeon ben Yohai said, “The best of among the Gentiles deserves to be killed. The best of snakes ought to have its head crushed.”

Jews, however, are exalted beings in the Talmud, worthy of praise. Christ described the Pharisee who blessed himself, saying, “I thank Thee, Lord, that I am not as other men.”

An imminent Talmudic rabbi says the same: “Blessed be Thou who hast not made me a boor or Gentile.”

There is a special antagonism between the Talmud and Jesus. The Talmud attacks Him everywhere it can—even His mother, Mary. The Talmud said was a whore who mated with carpenters: “She who was the descendant of princes and governors played the harlot with carpenters.”

It naturally followed that the scribes declared Christ to be a bastard. In its article on Jesus, the Jewish Encyclopedia says that Jewish writings defame Christ: “It is the tendency of all these sources to belittle the person of Jesus by ascribing to him illegitimate birth, magic, and a shameful death.”

Jesus, according to this article, was considered one of the three worst enemies of Judaism who came to an ignoble end. The Talmud says they subjected Him to four deaths: stoning, burning, decapitation, and strangling.

The Talmud also says He is now in hell, punished with boiling hot excrement. What is Christ’s advice as He speaks to us out of hell? The Jewish Encyclopedia quotes Jesus as telling us, above all, to bless the Jews.

He says further: “Their well-being—do nothing to their detriment. Whoever touches them touches even the apple of His eye.”

Christians, as followers of the false prophet Jesus, also deserve death. The Jewish Encyclopedia again recaps the Talmud’s position:

“A Gentile observing the Sabbath deserves death. The testimony of a Christian was not admitted in evidence in Jewish courts. And an Israelite who found anything belonging to one who was a Christian was forbidden to return it to him.”

The Pharisees, through their Talmud, thus gave the Jews an ethic which encouraged bigotry and isolation. But it did worse than that: it invited persecution.

By the 11th century, the inhabitants of Babylon, growing weary of the self-righteousness and dishonesty of the Jews, expelled them to the West.

So what would Christians do if they learned that all pastors secretly follow the Satanic Bible? In this way, most rabbis today—including those actively promoting the Hebrew Roots movement—follow the Talmud, which we might as well call a Satanic Bible.

Although Jewish rabbis today refer to the Torah, they do not follow the Torah that we think they follow—which would be the actual first five books of Moses. That’s what the Hebrew Roots people want us to believe.

But when Jews refer to the Torah, they secretly refer to their own man-made writings called their “Oral Torah”—nothing more than the teachings of men, the same teachings that Jesus constantly condemned the Pharisees for.

The concepts, ideologies, and wicked rules of the Talmud come straight from Satan Himself, and Satan shares many of his thoughts and ideas through the world of the occult.

That brings us to the next thing we find behind that curtain: Kabbalah. Kabbalah means “to receive” or “to channel” messages from evil spirits. Jewish mystics down through the centuries have allowed themselves to channel from Satan and then go on to describe fantasies, hidden codes, mysterious meanings to numbers and letters, and special relationships between those elements called “correspondences.”

Kabbalists describe conclusions, doctrines, and correspondences no more rational than those of someone high on LSD. Yet this particular realm of channeling called Kabbalah provides the basis not only for alchemists, Freemasons, Rosicrucians, and Luciferians, but Kabbalah provides the entire framework for Judaism itself.

Kabbalah is nothing more than sorcery. Although this would shock many people who bought the ticket into the Hebrew Roots movement, the sorcery of Kabbalah—even admitted by one of Judaism’s main websites—is the heart of Judaism, not God.

“Kabbalah—without Kabbalah, there is no Judaism.”

Melancholia I is the accepted name of a large 1514 German Renaissance engraving of an enigmatic winged angel figure, thought by most to be a personification of “melancholia,” which means “black bile” in Greek—the humor or body liquid thought by alchemists to be governed by the planet Saturn.

With head in hand, staring ahead, the area is strewn with symbols related to alchemy, geometry, or numerology—such as the hourglass, scales, and compass. Behind the figure is a ladder leading beyond the frame and a structure with an embedded magic square.

This 4×4 magic square of 16 integers has columns, rows, and diagonals that sum to 34—a common emblem of both folk and philosophical magic. Esoteric interpretations of this engraving reveal a deeper meaning linked through the Kabbalah of the high angel of Jewish mysticism, Metatron.

Albert Pike, quoting from “Transcendental Magic,” sums up the importance of Kabbalism as a key to Masonic esotericism, saying:

“One is filled with admiration on penetrating into the sanctuary of the Kabbalah at seeing a doctrine so logical, so simple, and at the same time so absolute. The necessary union of ideas and signs, the concentration of the most fundamental realities by the primitive characters, the Trinity of Words, letters, and numbers; a philosophy simple as the alphabet, profound and infinite as the Word; theorems more complete and luminous than those of Pythagoras; a theology summed up by counting on one’s fingers; an infinite which can be held in the hollow of an infant’s hand—10 ciphers and 22 letters, a triangle, a square, and a circle—these are all the elements of the Kabbalah. These are the elementary principles of the written word, reflection of that spoken word that created the world.”

It was Manly P. Hall who said:

“Few realize the influence exerted by Kabbalism over medieval thought, both Christian and Jewish. It thought that there existed within the sacred writings a hidden doctrine which was the key to those writings. The theories of Kabbalism are inextricably woven with the tenets of alchemy, Hermeticism, Rosicrucianism, and Freemasonry. The words ‘Kabbalism’ and ‘Hermeticism’ are now considered as synonymous terms covering all the arcana and esotericism of antiquity.”

So what is this big secret that is allegedly revered by the alchemists and therefore the Kabbalists and guarded by their veils of symbolism from the uninitiated masses and hidden beneath the veneer of modern Abrahamic religions?

According to esoteric legends, Solomon understood the mysteries of the Kabbalah. He was also an alchemist and a necromancer, being able to control the demons, and from them and other inhabitants of the invisible worlds, he secured much of his wisdom.

The esoteric interpretation of salvation was not about redemption of the Jewish people from slavery amongst other people but instead had to do with an inner salvation—an esoteric process of mystical healing and restoration of one’s own soul through a term called “Tikkun Olam,” which means “repairing the world” and has to do with the Lurianic Kabbalah’s idea of freeing leftover divine sparks of light that permeated existence after creation.

Madame Helena Blavatsky was the 19th century’s most famous mystic, occultist, and medium, co-founding the Theosophical Society in 1875. She aimed for a synthesis of science, religion, and philosophy.

Blavatsky taught that within each individual human, there’s an eternal divine facet, which she referred to as the “Higher Self” or “Inner God,” and that uniting with this Higher Self results in wisdom.

When she says “wisdom,” she’s not referring to the kind of knowledge that one acquires through reading books but rather it is defined as a divine intuition, sixth sense, or inner guidance that is most commonly acquired through entering into an altered state of consciousness.

The term for this practice is called “mysticism,” where one surrenders the ego through various techniques and merges with what some refer to as God and others believe is one’s own subconscious mind.

According to the Kabbalah—which is considered esoteric Jewish mysticism as it appeared after the 12th century but really is much older—Chokmah is the 10th Sephirah at the top of the right axis on the Tree of Life, corresponding to the left eye or the right hemisphere of the brain.

Chokmah is associated in the soul with the power of intuitive insight, and it’s the goal of Kabbalists to extract such insight from the superconscious realm.

According to the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, the name of God associated with Chokmah is Jehovah. And in the teachings of sex magician Aleister Crowley, Chokmah is represented in accordance with terms like “Tetragrammaton,” which in the occult unlocks the meaning behind astrology, the Tarot, the mysteries of the Bible, Kabbalah, the Enochian magic of John Dee.

Helena Blavatsky stated that the published works on the Kabbalah do not contain the inner secrets of the wisdom. The unwritten Kabbalah is transmitted orally and needs seven keys to unveil them.

The present Kabbalah, according to Blavatsky, originated from the secret doctrine of the Chaldeans and Egyptians and that the authentic Kabbalah was to be found in the Chaldean Book of Numbers in the possession of Persian Sufis.

In Judaism, “Mashiach” or “Messiah” is traditionally believed to be a king with political implications, associated with the return for certain Jewish sects to Israel after the Babylonian exile.

Lurianic Kabbalah enjoyed broad dissemination in the 1500s thanks to the invention of the printing press in the previous century. Jews from around the world, for the first time, had access to occult literature about the deeper meaning of their faith, and the popularity of Jewish mysticism soared.

A key aspect of Lurianic Kabbalah is that it required active participation to set the stage for the arrival of the Messiah—to bring about conditions that would initiate or directly expedite the fulfillment of Jewish Messianic prophecy.

In other words, instead of simply waiting for God to act, the Lurianic perspective expected Jews to play an active role in bringing forth God’s kingdom on earth.

This new European Kabbalah—as opposed to the older Chaldean version—is unanimously attributed to Luria and was extremely popular at the time and still is the most broadly disseminated and used Kabbalistic system taught today.

Part of this Kabbalistic method included ways of interpreting the supernatural relationship between events and time offered through letters and numbers. The magical emphasis given to the numerological value of dates contributed greatly to the widely held expectations and hope placed on the coming of a Messiah at the time.

The rapid spread of the teachings of Rabbi Isaac Luria and his Lurianic Kabbalah resulted in a grafting of the then-current theories of the Kabbalists onto the traditional Jewish view of the role and personality of the Messiah.

This new philosophic paradigm—and the estimation of many scholars—provided a spiritual justification for proactive Zionism and therefore the events that directly brought about the modern formation of Israel.

The Jews were not some small, remote desert tribe with a unique religion that got lucky and grew powerful through banking and usury but are part of the same ancient religious Mystery Schools spread globally which dominated the Hellenic world.

There was a point where Jewish spirituality had a choice to go the Islamic Sufi path or to take the path of what would become Kabbalah in the 13th and 14th centuries. It took the Kabbalistic path.

Classical Kabbalah is very much involved with living inside of myth. There’s a chain of mythologies that you sort of buy into—from the mythology of the Zohar and Shimon bar Yochai to the mythology of the Lurianic Renaissance to the ongoing preoccupation with Chasidic Rebbes as individual theologians.

Right? How can this actually carry over to me into my relationships and into my career? This and that? Well, it comes from that notion of “Tikkun,” which means “fix,” right?

And as people’s lives become more complicated and they maybe even make some missteps, they think more of, “How do I reclaim, recover, and fix my situation?” And the imagery of classical Kabbalah has always been very good for that.

Sometimes there’s an emptiness that underlies existence, and sometimes we have to draw on the reality of the emptiness or to find an empty space within ourselves—a meditative space, a space which holds within it that which can’t be quantified.

It’s an internal place that defies description, right? And therefore is sort of nothing—defies description and therefore is sort of nothing. So yeah, I think classical Kabbalah works well for this time we’re living in.

Today, many Christian parents would tell their kids not to have anything to do with a fortune teller at a carnival—and rightly so. Yet on Sundays, many of those same parents link arm-in-arm with a vast religious group that comes from the exact same world that those carnival fortune tellers come from.

Dean Lopar, in her book “Kabbalah Secrets Christians Need to Know,” exposes the imminent dangers posed by Kabbalah in its insidious and sneaky way as it cozies itself right into our Christian world. It permeates all facets, including—as you heard—the term “Shekinah,” that comes right out of the Zohar and not the Bible.

So here, much of the Christian world uses the term “Shekinah,” thinking that it’s a scriptural reference to the Holy Spirit when, in fact, it refers to the feminine half of the Jewish god—who is half male and half female.

In the last clip, we heard a rabbi speak about Kabbalah and all of the mythologies it contains:

“Kabbalah is very much involved with living inside of myth. There’s a chain of mythologies that you sort of buy into.”

In Titus 1:14, Paul warned to have nothing to do with Jewish myths and the commandments of men. How many of us knew that Paul referred to actual myths—the same myths that lie at the very heart of Judaism today?

The Zohar is the primary writing through which all those mythologies and the mythological doctrines are expressed for the rabbis to learn and quote from. The Zohar is sacred to Jewish rabbis, along with the Talmud, and Jewish rabbis hold the Zohar in much higher regard than the Bible itself.

Here’s just a little taste of what the Zohar teaches:

“The Zohar loves questioning. You know, you could say that’s really—that’s really one of the great things of all Jewish teaching of Midrash and the rabbis—and going back to Abraham—questioning and challenging God. So the Zohar is challenging our current theology.”

“The Zohar is dissatisfied with that picture of God seated up in heaven running the show. It presents an alternative to that which really does allow you a lot of leeway, a lot of room for imagination. It’s really learning from Maimonides. It’s really the Zohar—even though, you know, in a simplistic way, you could say Maimonides is the rationalist, the Zohar the mystics. How could the two ever get along? But the Kabbalists grow up on Maimonides, so they learn from Maimonides that you shouldn’t say what God is; you should say what God is not. And they take that to the extreme of saying, ‘God is not this or not that. God is no thing.’ So saying God is nothing really draws from Maimonides.”

“What do you think the Zohar has to uniquely to offer people today who are searching for spirituality?”

“I could point to three things. One is what we’ve just talked about—that ultimately, God is beyond all names—that the only term that really accurately depicts God is ‘infinity.’ And so, but if we’re going to talk about God, the Zohar insists that we balance the masculine with the feminine. And that’s a very important corrective because all Western religion is so dominantly male, so dominantly patriarchal. And you know, Mary Daly, the feminist, once said, ‘As long as God is male, the male is God.’ So unless we revise our vision of God, we’re not going to achieve social equality and gender equality. So the Zohar insists God is equally masculine and feminine.”

“And of course, the feminine half of God is known as ‘Shekinah.’ That word is not invented by the Kabbalah, but the Zohar really takes it and runs with it. And you could say the main character in the Zohar is the Shekinah.”

“Yeah, I think you know, we could learn from Jung. Carl Jung really says every man has a hidden feminine part within him; every woman, a hidden masculine part. So the thing is to become fully who you can be—not to be boxed into one predetermined.”

“The third element—so infinity and masculine-feminine—but the third, maybe most intriguing, is the Zohar teaches that God needs us. So God is somehow incomplete without our active participation—that we have an effect on God, that we—you could say—actualize the Divine in the world. It’s a beautiful name for the Shekinah—one mystic calls the Shekinah ‘Secret of the Possible.’ Say, ‘God is potentially here. God’s potentially in the world or potentially in our lives, but unless we cultivate an ethical, spiritual lifestyle, God remains unactualized and incomplete.'”

Besides the Talmud and the Zohar, rabbis also revere other rabbis, often quoting the sages of old as though quoting God Himself.

“He’s got the Ph.D.; he’s got knowledge—it must be good. And I can tell you, rabbis in Israel, we learn the same way. Whatever the rabbi tells you, it says this comes from the mouth of God. You don’t question this.”

They also virtually worship one particular man named Maimonides, a Jewish philosopher who lived during the 12th century. Maimonides was an extreme Talmudist, and virtually all rabbis today regard Maimonides as the highest human authority in Judaism.

“If you truly want to follow Torah, I will go to the highest authority—the highest authority in Judaism: Maimonides.”

We are about to hear the shocking secret of those promoting the name “Yeshua.” But there is one more secret hiding behind that curtain that I’d like to show you first, and that is the magic language used by the Jews.

The Jews have convinced the world to call that language “Hebrew,” but their language is no more Hebrew than it is Swedish, Italian, or even Pig Latin. And I’m about to show you.

By the time Jesus came to Earth, the only Old Testament scrolls to survive were Greek scrolls that had been translated from the actual Hebrew scrolls about 2,500 years ago. The translation project was critical because the authentic Hebrew scrolls were hundreds of years old and literally falling apart.

So the Old Testament scrolls translated into Greek were the only copy of the original Old Testament scrolls that anyone would have from there on in. The authentic Hebrew scrolls would never be seen again.

As the Hebrew scrolls were aging, the Hebrew language was aging and even becoming extinct. The Jews gradually stopped speaking the language, starting about 400 years before Jesus, and they took on the ways and languages of the people around them.

By the time Jesus arrived, no one had been speaking authentic Hebrew for 200 years. When Jesus came, the Jews in Judea spoke Aramaic, which is not Hebrew. The Jews outside of Judea spoke Greek, along with practically everyone else.

Jesus spoke Greek most of the time when He ministered and also used those Greek scrolls called the Septuagint to read. Jesus also knew Aramaic and occasionally used Aramaic phrases at key events in His life and ministry, such as when He raised a girl from the dead and just before taking His last breath on the cross.

He said, “Talitha, koum,” which meant, “Little girl, arise.” It did not mean, “Why have you forsaken me, Father?” as the phrase has erroneously been translated.

After Jesus returned to heaven, the same Jewish rabbis who had killed Jesus continued to plot against Him. They maintained their positions of leadership in Jerusalem and established many Talmudic academies, as we already heard.

Through their Talmud, they wrote down all of those wicked laws and traditions and constructed the writings we call the Talmud. Those Talmudic Jewish rabbis hated the Septuagint because the Septuagint presented the prophets’ descriptions of the coming Messiah, and those descriptions clearly pointed to Jesus.

The rabbis knew that if the Jewish people started reading the Septuagint, they would know that Jesus was the Messiah, and that would not make those rabbis very happy.

So those rabbis came up with a plan to make their own Old Testament. That way, they could chop up the content in the Septuagint, discard and change all those annoying references to Jesus, and then present the finished product in a whole new book of their own.

They also decided to create a new language so they could write down their new book in their own magical way. The Talmudic rabbis started their new alphabet by first taking the letters of the Aramaic alphabet and then adding a whole assortment of special dots and points and even a few magical decorations called amulets.

Now, those rabbis could accommodate any interest in the Old Testament by offering their own chop-chop version and erroneously say that it was Hebrew. Besides, I think we could call this an early instance of controlled opposition.

“Don’t tell the people not to read the Old Testament; just keep them away from the real version and the accurate version by offering them your chop-chop version to read instead.”

No doubt, those Kabbalist rabbis had no real interest in the true contents of the Old Testament anyway. They had little regard for the prophets and, according to Jesus, didn’t even follow Moses like they claimed.

Remember when Jesus told the Pharisees, “If you truly followed Moses, then you would believe Me, because Moses wrote about Me”?

The entire task to make up the language and copy down all of the chop-chop Old Testament would last nearly nine centuries, but the foundation for this new work was laid down by three Talmudic Kabbalist rabbis.

First, Rabbi Akiva—a highly revered Talmudic rabbi that Jews refer to as “chief of the sages.” He was a leading contributor to the Talmud itself and a principal founder of Rabbinic Judaism. He also loved doing the chop-chop cleanup of the Septuagint references to Jesus because Rabbi Akiva hated Jesus with a passion.

Next came Rabbi Aquila of Sinope. Initially converting from paganism to Christianity, Rabbi Aquila’s devout love for astrology led him to reject Jesus and move on to Judaism. There, Aquila and his love for astrology fit right in to make him become a Talmudic Jew and work as a student under Rabbi Akiva.

Rabbi Aquila gladly helped Akiva in his chop-chop project of the Septuagint.

Rabbi Aquila finished his thing in 130 A.D., and then came along Rabbi Yose ben Halafta to put the finishing touches on the project. He was one of Akiva’s top five students and also impressively studied under the main writer of that greatly revered book called the Zohar.

Rabbi Yose even sat on the Sanhedrin. So with great occult knowledge and power of his own, this last rabbi perfected and standardized the language with all of its dots and points and magical crowns.

The language was constructed, engineered, and made from scratch. It was not made to record a spoken language like all other languages. This one was different, and no one could even speak it for 2,000 years after they started to make it up.

If you would like to cross-check all of this, I invite you to listen to the following rabbi whose statements confirm what hidden history shows us, but today’s popular narrative leaves out:

“But when you realize that these are just grammatical decisions—the way the language was constructed—the story of Hebrew in the 20th century is the amazing story of an engineered language where people decided that they were going to create a language almost out of nothing.”

“The story of Hebrew in the 20th century is the amazing story of an engineered language—an engineered language where people decided that they were going to create a language almost out of nothing. It wasn’t a spoken language.”

“And in 1924, when the Technion was opened in Israel, the decision was originally made that classes would be taught in German because that was the only thing that made sense because how in the world are you going to teach sciences in Hebrew when the professors don’t know Hebrew and the students don’t know Hebrew?”

“And people forced them. The Zionist movement said, ‘It’s impossible to open a school that’s going to be in German.’ And so, you know, they struggled, and they created it.”

“From around the year one until the year 1900, there was hardly anybody in the world who was speaking Hebrew on a regular basis.”

After the foundation for a new engineered language was carefully laid by 160 A.D., more and more Talmudic rabbis called Masoretes continued to work on the chopped-up Septuagint text and continued writing it into the new magical language for a few centuries afterwards.

During the 10th century, the project was complete, and by that time, no one questioned the idea of calling the new language “Hebrew,” and no one really noticed how much of the original Old Testament had been changed.

Today, refer to that finished chop-chop book written in a magic language as the “Masoretic Old Testament,” written in “Masoretic Hebrew.” That is the so-called Hebrew version which was later translated into English that King James chose for his new Bible.

That chop-chop version of the Old Testament—believe it or not—is the Old Testament version most of our Bibles contain today.

You will hear multitudes of people today promote this phony Hebrew. They claim that it is special. They even tell you that learning the language will get you closer to God. And if you listen long enough to what certain of their rabbis say, you’ll hear about hidden secrets, secret meanings, secret codes, and supernatural relationships found within the chop-chop version of the Old Testament due to the magic language they made up.

Let’s hear some of those occult secrets now as rabbis discuss who “Yeshua” really is, what he’s really like, where he is right now, why all the secrecy about his true identity, and the shocking reasons why the Jews and Judaizers have been putting so much pressure on innocent Christians to call Jesus by a fake name—”Yeshua”—instead of Jesus.

First, “Yeshua” is a snake.

“The Hebrew word ‘snake’—it’s a word ‘Nachash.’ It’s equivalent in the mathematics of the Hebrew letters to the word ‘Messiah.’ It’s the same. Hebrew word ‘serpent’ and ‘Messiah’ in Hebrew—they have the exact same mathematical value.”

Actually, “Yeshua” is currently in chains like a prisoner, and he also resembles a pig.

“There is a passage in Psalm 146 that says that the Lord will loosen the prisoner. Okay, the question becomes: Who is the prisoner? Who is he talking about in the psalm? The sages of old—and when I’m talking the sages of old, I’m talking even before Yeshua’s time—even says that this prisoner—the word ‘prisoner’ in Hebrew can mean ‘forbidden.’ The Lord is going to take something that is forbidden, unclean—like a serpent—something that is very unclean. We all agree. And He will heal Israel, just like in Numbers 21, is going to be the Messiah who is resembled a pig.”

“Yeshua is a pig. And when he comes back, he will uncover himself, and people will see that he was clean after all.”

“Hebrew is a funny language. Every animal has a meaning, okay? The name of the animal has a meaning. And the pig—actually, the word ‘pig’ means ‘to come back.’ The Hebrew word ‘Chazir’ is rooted in ‘Chazar,’ and they said this is the picture of the Messiah. He will appear as a pig, which is a symbol of uncleanness for the Jewish people. And when he returns, he will uncover himself, unmask himself, and he will be the cleanest, purest.”

“But who says that? The Jewish people.”

“Yeshua is the prodigal son. He’s been a bad boy by going to the Gentiles. But don’t worry, he’s coming back home to Zion.”

“In Passover, we drink four cups of wine. They represent the four children—you know, the four types of Jews in the world. You have the wise one, you have the wicked one, you have one that is innocent, and you have one that doesn’t know how to ask. And then there is a fifth cup. It’s called the cup of Elijah. Nobody knows what it is. It’s the fifth cup—’Kos.’ Take the word ‘Kos,’ flip the letters—what name do you get? ‘Mashiach.’ ‘Kos’—’Mashiach.’ You get it? You know Hebrew? Yeah.”

“Now the question: Who is this fifth son? Who is he called in Judaism? The prodigal son. Do you want to know who is the prodigal son? The prodigal son is the Messiah himself. He appears wicked. He doesn’t say he’s wicked. Where is he going? He’s going to the Gentiles. He’s going to be with the Gentiles. But he’s coming back home.”

“Yeshua has no clothes on and has lost all his glory.”

“Aaron lost two things in Edom. He lost his clothes, just as Yeshua today—he’s lost his clothes as a Jewish Messiah. And he lost his glory, just as Yeshua lost his glory amongst the house of Israel.”

“Yeshua today—he’s lost his clothes as a Jewish Messiah. Yeshua lost his glory amongst the house of Israel.”

“Yeshua” has another identity, and he is associated with other gods. His other identities are Metatron and Prince of the Face. He associates with one particular strange god named “Tzur.”

“May it be Your will that at the sounding of the shofar that we blow today, we will be as a sapphire that is filled with the fear of the One in charge—Tzur. The One in charge—Tzur—as You accepted Elijah, blessed be his name, and Yeshua—Yeshua, who is called the Prince of the Face, who is the Prince Metatron. Yeshua, who is called the Prince of the Face, who is the Prince Metatron—may You fill us with His mercy. Blessed be Your Name, Lord of Mercies.”

In this clip, we saw one of the most blatant proofs that the Jews do not at all associate “Yeshua” with Jesus of Nazareth. This clip comes from the Talmud, and we already know that the Talmud has nothing good to say about Jesus. In fact, wherever it can, it says horrible things about Jesus.

So in this reference to “Yeshua”—AKA Metatron and Prince of the Face—by virtue of its location in the Talmud and the fact that it describes “Yeshua” in a glorious way, we know that the Talmud itself proves that the Jews know that “Yeshua” is not Jesus.

Besides that, if we want even more blatant proof, we see in the various footnotes found in the Talmud citing various code names for Jesus in all those blasphemous passages about Jesus that when code names are used instead of Jesus, those footnotes state that the code names apply to Jesus.

The Talmud knows His name is Jesus and even uses the name “Jesus” in footnotes—not “Yeshua.”

Furthermore, in this previous clip, we hear “Yeshua” described as a prince, but Jesus is a king. He is a king above all other kings. All power and authority were given to Him by the Father. A prince, by contrast, has only limited power.

And yet, we might ask: What about the reference to the Prince of Peace in Isaiah 9:6? Doesn’t that passage refer to Jesus? Yes, it does refer to Jesus, but remember that chop-chop version of the Old Testament made up by the Kabbalist Masoretes? Well, we can thank them for using the word “prince” in that passage. It wasn’t there in the original text.

The original Septuagint translation of Isaiah 9:6 simply read, “I will bring peace upon the rulers—peace and health.”

However, Jesus referred to a “prince” when He spoke about Satan in John 14:30:

“Jesus said, ‘I will not speak with you much longer, for the prince of this world is coming, and he has no claim on Me.'”

“Prince” in that statement refers to Satan. Likewise, “Yeshua,” “Prince Metatron,” and “Prince of the Face” refer to Satan as well.

So the Jews have knowingly and deliberately passed along the name of their Antichrist hero—the name “Yeshua”—for the purpose of conning millions of Christians into using that name instead of Jesus.

But there’s more. “Yeshua” doesn’t want the Jews to wait for him. He’s waiting for the Jews. They have to call him in by using the name of “Yeshua” in order to anoint him and make him come.

Remember that we heard from Lurianic Kabbalah that the Jews play an important part in speeding up the return of their Antichrist Messiah.

“We, the Jewish people, have to call and say, ‘Anoint him as Messiah.’ Any act of messiahship has to start with the people—not with God—with the people.”

“A lot of Christians say that we are waiting on Messiah. It’s wrong. Messiah is waiting upon us.”

The Jews are getting pretty antsy for the return of their so-called Messiah, and it appears that Christians—aka the nations—are causing an annoying delay in that process.

“Maimonides, which is arguably the most important rabbi of the Middle Ages, says in this 12th principle: ‘I believe in a perfect faith in the coming of the Messiah. Even if He will delay, I will await Him every day until He comes.’ But that’s not without its end. It says, ‘Whoever does not await and expect Him, he’s a heretic.'”

“In the Torah of Moses, we must have to look at the Jewish people and said to them, ‘Who is your Messiah? Who is your high priest?’ This is the challenge today.”

“There is a spiritual obstacle today. And I’m telling you, the key—I believe the key today is with the nations actually. The key today is with the nations actually returning to the Jewishness of their faith—returning to the Jewishness of their faith.”

Jews want the Christians to know: “Yeshua” is not returning to them. He is returning to the Jews.

“Listen to me, Christians: He is not returning to the church. He is returning to Israel.”

“Listen to me, Christians: He is not returning to the church. He is returning to Israel.”

Not only is “Yeshua” not coming for the Christians—that is for their benefit—but as soon as “Yeshua” gets freedom from Edom (or Christianity), “Yeshua” will crush Christianity. That is, he will destroy Christianity as an entity.

“In Isaiah chapter 63—the day of the great and terrible day of the Lord—it says that the Lord will come out from a place called Edom, and He will crush Edom.”

“It says that the Lord will come out from a place called Edom, and He will crush Edom.”

“In Jewish understanding, Edom is really talking about Christianity. Christianity is Edom.”

“Christianity is Edom. Edom’s name in the Scripture is Esau. Esau—if you turn the letters around, you get the name ‘Yeshua.'”

“If you want to have a separate entity called the church aside from Israel, not only that you will not meet Yeshua, but in the last days, you will be destroyed. You will be destroyed.”

“Do you still think that Jesus and Yeshua are the same person? Or has the Holy Spirit opened your eyes before it was too late? I really hope that He has.”

And now, just before the final warning, I’d first like to thank Trevor Davis of “Declaring the Kingdom” and “Sounding the Alarm.com” and Elizabeth Kizy of “Elizabeth Kizy” YouTube channel for their outstanding research and immeasurable contributions to the content of this video.

And most of all, a big thank you to the Holy Spirit, who is our faithful teacher and always willing to lead us to the truth by His hand—even in a world saturated with lies.

The Lord bless you as you take this matter seriously.

“There is no joining to Yeshua without the house of Israel. If you love Yeshua, you have to take upon yourself a Jewish identity. There’s no other way around.”

“If you want to have a separate entity called the church aside from Israel, not only that you will not meet Yeshua, but in the last days, you will be destroyed.”

“I believe to kick the Christians in the butt and tell them, ‘Go further in so that you will be with us.’ Read about all the prophecies of what God is going to do with Edom—with Christianity. He will destroy the entity—the church—as we know it.”

“Because when he’s returning—listen to me, Christians—he is not returning to the church. He is returning to Israel.”

“And this is the core problem today with you Christians. You think that Jesus is returning to the church, but he is not returning to the church. He is returning to Israel.”

“Who do you think that Yeshua belonged to? The church? He is returning as a groom to the bride. Israel is called the bride.”

“In Isaiah chapter 63—the day of the great and terrible day of the Lord—it says that the Lord will come out from a place called Edom, and He will crush Edom.”

“In Jewish understanding, Edom is really talking about Christianity. Christianity is Edom.”

“Moses, when he was brought up—where was he brought up? In Egypt. What did he destroy? Egypt.”

“It says that the Lord will come out from a place called Edom, and He will crush Edom.”

“We let Yeshua inside the land of Edom, and we say, ‘Yeshua, we love you.’ So you’re a prisoner. Yeshua, you’re a prisoner. You are not returning home.”

“And a matter of fact, the Book of Ecclesiastes chapter 4 says that the Messiah will resemble a prisoner.”

“It says that the Lord will come out from a place called Edom, and He will crush Edom.”

“And now I can be honest with you. We know exactly who he is. Like, you saw in the prayer, but there is one part I left out because I felt it might be too shocking for your audience. We know where he’s at—where Yeshua is at today. You ready? He is with the Christians. He’s with the Christians. And we called upon him to come back home to Zion.”

“In Yom Kippur, it’s basically saying, ‘Leave, leave Christianity and come back to Zion.’ It literally says that in the prayer.”

“Hebrew is a very dynamic language. The word ‘pig’—’Chazir’—is rooted in the Hebrew word ‘Chazar’—’to return.’ The pig will become clean again. He will change.”

“The Midrash explained that a lot of things will turn into physical when Messiah comes. The rabbis explained to us Messiah relates to the Hebrew ‘Nachash’—a serpent. Well, how can a serpent be a Messiah? I mean, a serpent is something evil and wicked. And they explained that something that appears in the shell—in the klippa—on the outside is unclean, in the inside represents the highest level of kedushah—holiness.”

“Messiah—you know what Israel needs today? They need Yeshua. They need Yeshua. But if you bring Jesus, you bring the wrong guy. Don’t bring us Jesus.”

“Even in the Torah, it says that the highest name of Hashem is called ‘Chazir’—the pig of God. Or the pig is God. The pig of God or the pig is God.”

“Let’s go to Exodus 4, verse 22: ‘And you will tell Pharaoh, “Thus says the Lord: My son, My oldest son—Israel.”‘ Who is the Son of God? The Son of God is Israel. The Son of God is Yeshua, too.”

“The second that we separate Yeshua from Zion, he cannot return. Bring the real Yeshua—the Jewish Messiah. Bring the real Yeshua. But if you bring Jesus, you bring the wrong guy. Don’t bring us Jesus. Don’t bring us Jesus. Don’t bring us Jesus.”

This reformatted version maintains the original content while organizing it into clear paragraphs, sentences, and headlines for better readability. The timestamps have been removed as requested. Let me know if you’d like any further refinements!