The Pauline Conspiracy Pt 1 of 4

The Pauline Conspiracy Pt 1 of 4

The Pauline Conspiracy Pt 1 of 4. Saul of Tarsus, better known as Saint Paul, has sometimes been a controversial figure in Christianity. The Gospels by themselves would feature as important wisdom literature, but Paul’s Epistles demonstrate the building of the real theology of Christianity. Although some dislike the apparent cultural inflections in the Epistles, without the theology of Saul of Tarsus there is no Christian Doctrine.

In this in-depth scholarly thesis by victor, he systematically analyses the letters of Saul – to set up his ultimate prosecution, and the accusation that Saul of Tarsus did not simply usurp the embryonic Jersusalem Church under Jesus’s brother James, but that he also corrupted the entire original message of Christianity as it was then into something utterly alien.

The Pauline Conspiracy Pt 2 of 4

The Pauline Conspiracy Pt 2 of 4. It was a city which had fostered a society of ‘loose moral character’, and even having accepted Paul’s teachings, saw no reason why they should have to give up their sexual practices.

Obviously this problem would be accentuated in Paul’s mind since he took a stand on the opposite side of the scale, absolute abstinence. How then might he consider himself an authority on marriage, and the social and marital differences between husband and wife? Your guess is as good as mine, but he does.

The Pauline Conspiracy Pt 3 of 4

The Pauline Conspiracy Pt 3 of 4. The article claims that the English word “church” is a mistranslation and deliberate corruption of the Greek word “ekklesia,” which originally meant an assembly or group of called-out ones. This mistranslation has had deep spiritual and political consequences, creating a false religious system distinct from the one Jesus and the early apostles established.

The Pauline Conspiracy Pt 4 of 4

The Pauline Conspiracy Pt 4 of 4. The article critically examines the authenticity and influence of the Apostle Paul’s teachings, arguing that his theology diverges significantly from the original teachings of Jesus and the early Jerusalem Church. It claims that Paul’s letters, particularly Colossians, Philippians, and Ephesians, contain doctrines that are Hellenistic and Gnostic in nature, rather than rooted in the historical Jesus’ life or the practices of the Apostles. The author suggests that Paul’s interpretations have shaped modern Christianity in ways that contradict Jesus’ teachings and the Jewish-Christian tradition.

Paul vs. Jesus: 25 Contradictory and Incompatible Statements

Paul vs. Jesus: 25 Contradictory and Incompatible Statements

Paul vs. Jesus: 25 Contradictory and Incompatible Statements. The following statements from Paul’s letters are symptomatic of deep differences between the doctrines of Paul and Jesus — much as a fever is symptomatic of an infection in the body.  You can read a discussion of their differences in Paul: the Stranger, my book that exposes Paul as a liar and a false prophet who did not know Jesus.  The most significant difference is in their salvation doctrines as derived from their interpretations of the crucifixion.  In these fundamental areas, Paul’s errors and false gospel are obvious to anyone who follows Jesus as teacher and listens carefully to Jesus’ words.  Very seldom does anyone in Christendom so listen to Jesus as to receive his Word of Truth, even though the gospels repeatedly quote his Word.  The reason?  The churchmen get to everyone first with false Pauline doctrine, which then stands between them and Jesus, blocking the Light.  His words come through but not his message.  My hope is that this list will motivate you to remove the blindfold and see the Good Shepherd as he is.